By Rav Uriel Touitou – Excellence Program, Elkanah Campus
In an unusual step, the presenters at a recent academic conference were college students – including a group of students from Orot Israel College’s Excellence Program. Organized jointly by the National Excellence Program and the Education Ministry’s Experiments and Projects Division, the conference focused on educational projects and experiments conducted at various schools across the country.
Early in the school year, the Orot students met with representatives of the Experiments and Projects Division as well as staff members from two different high schools: Yeshivat Kinor David in Ateret and Ulpanat Dolev in Dolev, where they learned about the experimental education project run by these schools. Later, they visited the schools for observation and spoke to the principals, teachers, and high school students about their experiences and impressions of the project.
As the semester progressed, the Orot students continued to learn more about the project. They studied the material they received from the principals and kept in touch with the staff members, who graciously answered their questions.
Finally, the group of students used their findings to compile a dynamic and well-prepared report – including a workshop, an activity, explanations, and a slide show - and presented it at the conference. Special thanks to the two principals – Rav Ilan Biton of Ulpanat Dolev and Rav Motti Hershkopf of Yeshivat Kinor David – for their considerable help and support.
Throughout the entire process, the students concentrated on one question: As future educators, what can we learn from the experiment?
According to the students, the experiment demonstrated that core pedagogical principles can be adapted to meet the needs of different schools which cater to, social structures, and values. In addition, the students discovered that educators should not feel restricted by the traditional school or classroom format. Rather, educators must implement and incorporate innovative and creative ideas into their teaching.
As head of Orot Israel College’s Excellence Program, I am proud to say that the students acquired more than dry knowledge. They were exposed to experiential learning which enabled them to gain a better understanding and appreciation of the educational project they studied. Furthermore, their impressive presentation at the conference showed that they have become independent thinkers. Clearly, they learned just as much from the method they used to study the project as they did from the project itself.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Orot Israel College Featured At a Book Launch Event
by Dr. Shraga Fisherman and Rav Yosef Hershlikovitz – Elkana Campus
Dr. Shraga Fisherman and Rav Yosef Hershlikovitz’s new book, “Lehi’ot Mechanech: Sipurah Shel Michlalah B’Nisui” (“To Be an Educator: The Story of a College Experiment”), describes an innovative six year experiment conducted at Orot Israel College geared to train homeroom teachers. Although the homeroom teacher plays a primary and significant role in student education, little research has been done on training programs for homeroom teachers. The experiment’s goal was to shed light on this topic.
The groundbreaking book was launched at the Mofet Institute. Chaired by Mrs. Lily Russo of the Education Ministry’s Experiments and Projects Division, the launch event included a round table discussion involving educators, school supervisors, principals, teachers from the schools that took part in the experiment, Orot faculty members, and representatives of the Mofet Institute. The panel examined several questions, including: Should homeroom teachers undergo special training? If so, when is the optimal time for this training to be held? And finally, what conclusions can be drawn from the experiment?
The participants all concurred that a homeroom teacher requires specific training. Although a homeroom teacher must possess certain innate personal character traits such as empathy and warmth – these traits are insufficient. Many professional and pedagogical skills must be taught.
However, the participants differed with respect to the question of the ideal time for homeroom teacher training. While some felt that pre-service training is preferable due to trainees’ availability and openness to new ideas, others recommended in-service training after the homeroom teachers’ have the benefits of experience and maturity.
According to the authors, the experiment proved that education students can be taught the critical skills they need to serve as homeroom teachers. In addition, the experiment delved into related issues such as teaching morals and values, pedocentric education and interpersonal communication, and focused on three identity systems: personal identity, spiritual identity, and professional identity.
The Orot Israel College students who took part in the experiment acquired extremely valuable tools which will help them develop both personally and professionally as they pursue their careers as educators in the field.
Dr. Shraga Fisherman and Rav Yosef Hershlikovitz’s new book, “Lehi’ot Mechanech: Sipurah Shel Michlalah B’Nisui” (“To Be an Educator: The Story of a College Experiment”), describes an innovative six year experiment conducted at Orot Israel College geared to train homeroom teachers. Although the homeroom teacher plays a primary and significant role in student education, little research has been done on training programs for homeroom teachers. The experiment’s goal was to shed light on this topic.
The groundbreaking book was launched at the Mofet Institute. Chaired by Mrs. Lily Russo of the Education Ministry’s Experiments and Projects Division, the launch event included a round table discussion involving educators, school supervisors, principals, teachers from the schools that took part in the experiment, Orot faculty members, and representatives of the Mofet Institute. The panel examined several questions, including: Should homeroom teachers undergo special training? If so, when is the optimal time for this training to be held? And finally, what conclusions can be drawn from the experiment?
The participants all concurred that a homeroom teacher requires specific training. Although a homeroom teacher must possess certain innate personal character traits such as empathy and warmth – these traits are insufficient. Many professional and pedagogical skills must be taught.
However, the participants differed with respect to the question of the ideal time for homeroom teacher training. While some felt that pre-service training is preferable due to trainees’ availability and openness to new ideas, others recommended in-service training after the homeroom teachers’ have the benefits of experience and maturity.
According to the authors, the experiment proved that education students can be taught the critical skills they need to serve as homeroom teachers. In addition, the experiment delved into related issues such as teaching morals and values, pedocentric education and interpersonal communication, and focused on three identity systems: personal identity, spiritual identity, and professional identity.
The Orot Israel College students who took part in the experiment acquired extremely valuable tools which will help them develop both personally and professionally as they pursue their careers as educators in the field.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Pesach, Matzah and Maror: The Essence of Jewish Education
Every Sunday morning, a student studying in Orot's M.A. program for Educational Counseling hitches a ride with me from Yad Binyamin to Elkana. During the ride, conversations often turn towards the material that he's studying. (While Orot's B.Ed. program in Elkana is for women only, men also study in separate classes towards M.A. degrees.) It's been interesting to watch as the trajectory of our conversations has shifted over the course of the year.
At the beginning, my "tremper" complained bitterly about the program. "It's so theoretical! I deal with real kids every day. I need to know how to handle the kids in the real world, and not delve into arcane psychological theory." And yet, as the year has progressed, his complaints have grown more tempered, and his appreciation for the program has grown. This morning he told me that he's already enlisted three friends to register for the program for next year.
What changed? I can tell you categorically that the program didn’t suddenly shift orientation due to his complaints. Rather, his appreciation for the material slowly matured. While he at first failed to see the significance of the theory to his work, over time he began to appreciate that while the theory of counseling might not directly impact on his counseling specifically, it allowed him to gain a broader, deeper appreciation for his work.
The "Obilgation" of the Three Symbols: What Obligation?
As we near the conclusion of Maggid and can almost taste the matzah in our mouths, we recite a famous statement from Rabban Gamliel, which is actually a direct quote from the Mishnah in Pesachim (116b):
While his statement which obligates us to mention each of these three critical elements during the Seder seems clear, it's actually anything but. What "obligation" does one fail to fulfill should he not mention the three elements? Where do we find such an obligation? Not surprisingly, the answered to this question is mired in dispute.
According to Ramban (see מלמחות ה', דף ב' בדפי הרי"ף), one who fails to mention these three elements does not properly fulfill his obligation to eat the three foods on the night of Pesach. While the Torah commands us to eat, Rabban Gamliel adds that eating is not enough. One must also speak about them, understand them, and place them in the context of the story. Others, including Ra'avan, disagree, explaining that one who fails to mention these three foods does not completely fulfill the obligation to tell the story of יציאת מצרים.
A Critical Educational Lesson
Yet, when we take a step back, both positions seem to be two sides of the same coin. According to each position, Rabban Gamliel was expressing a critical idea.
On the first night of Pesach we confront two very different types of mitzvot. The first is academic: והגדת לבנך – "and you shall tell your child" the story of the Exodus from Egypt. At face value, telling a story is a theoretical exercise, as we recount the historical tale of our ancestors' exit from slavery. (Anyone who has ever been stuck in a boring history class can attest to just how irrelevant names and dates can be.) The second type of Mitzvah is action-oriented. More specifically, on this night we are commanded to eat, whether we taste the simplicity of the matzah, the bitterness of the Maror, or the richness of the Korban Pesach.
According to Rabban Gamliel, if we allowed these two elements to remain separate and disconnected, we would fail both in our telling of the story and in our eating of the food, as we neglected to focus on the critical connection between the learning and discussion and the tastes associated with that story. Rabban Gamliel reminds us that Chazal designed the different elements of the Seder to complement each-other. The study and action go hand-in-hand, each building upon the other to create a complete educational experience.
Rabban Gamliel's Lesson in the Real World of Education...and Parenting!
Education is a tricky thing. On the one hand, in the purest sense, learning is an academic, intellectual pursuit. It can be dry and theoretical, conducted in the sterile, antiseptic Ivory Tower, devoid of any real-world meaning. At the same time, practical education without underlying thought, analysis and study leaves students with a shallow, peripheral understanding of the material. Without the deeper meaning, contemplation and reflective analysis academic study demands, a student's understand is cursory at best.
In the world of Chinuch, the same holds true. If our students can analyze and parse complicated tracts of Gemara but don’t see any connection between their Torah studies and the music that they listen to or the movies that they watch, then their Torah education is sorely lacking. At the same time, if through fantastic experiential programming we've instilled in them a passion for spirituality and love of Judaism but they can't read a line of Rashi, we've also failed them.
On the night of Pesach, Rabban Gamliel reminds us that our children's education must be comprised of both academic knowledge and practical meaning. It must combine the story of יציאת מצרים together with the tastes of the Pesach foods. Only when we, as parents and teachers, combine these two critical elements together, can we rest assured that we have indeed fulfilled our educational obligation to our children.
At the beginning, my "tremper" complained bitterly about the program. "It's so theoretical! I deal with real kids every day. I need to know how to handle the kids in the real world, and not delve into arcane psychological theory." And yet, as the year has progressed, his complaints have grown more tempered, and his appreciation for the program has grown. This morning he told me that he's already enlisted three friends to register for the program for next year.
What changed? I can tell you categorically that the program didn’t suddenly shift orientation due to his complaints. Rather, his appreciation for the material slowly matured. While he at first failed to see the significance of the theory to his work, over time he began to appreciate that while the theory of counseling might not directly impact on his counseling specifically, it allowed him to gain a broader, deeper appreciation for his work.
The "Obilgation" of the Three Symbols: What Obligation?
As we near the conclusion of Maggid and can almost taste the matzah in our mouths, we recite a famous statement from Rabban Gamliel, which is actually a direct quote from the Mishnah in Pesachim (116b):
רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל הָיָה אומֵר: כָּל שֶׁלּא אָמַר שְׁלשָׁה דְּבָרִים אֵלּוּ בַּפֶּסַח, לא יָצָא יְדֵי חובָתו, וְאֵלוּ הֵן: פֶּסַח, מַצָה, וּמָרור.Rabban Gamliel used to say: Anyone who did not speak about three things did not fulfill his obligation. And they are: Pesach (the Paschal lamb), Matzah, and Maror.
While his statement which obligates us to mention each of these three critical elements during the Seder seems clear, it's actually anything but. What "obligation" does one fail to fulfill should he not mention the three elements? Where do we find such an obligation? Not surprisingly, the answered to this question is mired in dispute.
According to Ramban (see מלמחות ה', דף ב' בדפי הרי"ף), one who fails to mention these three elements does not properly fulfill his obligation to eat the three foods on the night of Pesach. While the Torah commands us to eat, Rabban Gamliel adds that eating is not enough. One must also speak about them, understand them, and place them in the context of the story. Others, including Ra'avan, disagree, explaining that one who fails to mention these three foods does not completely fulfill the obligation to tell the story of יציאת מצרים.
A Critical Educational Lesson
Yet, when we take a step back, both positions seem to be two sides of the same coin. According to each position, Rabban Gamliel was expressing a critical idea.
On the first night of Pesach we confront two very different types of mitzvot. The first is academic: והגדת לבנך – "and you shall tell your child" the story of the Exodus from Egypt. At face value, telling a story is a theoretical exercise, as we recount the historical tale of our ancestors' exit from slavery. (Anyone who has ever been stuck in a boring history class can attest to just how irrelevant names and dates can be.) The second type of Mitzvah is action-oriented. More specifically, on this night we are commanded to eat, whether we taste the simplicity of the matzah, the bitterness of the Maror, or the richness of the Korban Pesach.
According to Rabban Gamliel, if we allowed these two elements to remain separate and disconnected, we would fail both in our telling of the story and in our eating of the food, as we neglected to focus on the critical connection between the learning and discussion and the tastes associated with that story. Rabban Gamliel reminds us that Chazal designed the different elements of the Seder to complement each-other. The study and action go hand-in-hand, each building upon the other to create a complete educational experience.
Rabban Gamliel's Lesson in the Real World of Education...and Parenting!
Education is a tricky thing. On the one hand, in the purest sense, learning is an academic, intellectual pursuit. It can be dry and theoretical, conducted in the sterile, antiseptic Ivory Tower, devoid of any real-world meaning. At the same time, practical education without underlying thought, analysis and study leaves students with a shallow, peripheral understanding of the material. Without the deeper meaning, contemplation and reflective analysis academic study demands, a student's understand is cursory at best.
In the world of Chinuch, the same holds true. If our students can analyze and parse complicated tracts of Gemara but don’t see any connection between their Torah studies and the music that they listen to or the movies that they watch, then their Torah education is sorely lacking. At the same time, if through fantastic experiential programming we've instilled in them a passion for spirituality and love of Judaism but they can't read a line of Rashi, we've also failed them.
On the night of Pesach, Rabban Gamliel reminds us that our children's education must be comprised of both academic knowledge and practical meaning. It must combine the story of יציאת מצרים together with the tastes of the Pesach foods. Only when we, as parents and teachers, combine these two critical elements together, can we rest assured that we have indeed fulfilled our educational obligation to our children.
Monday, March 26, 2012
Orot Students Visit Programs Geared For At-Risk Teens
In Orot Israel College’s Department of Informal and Communal Education, the curriculum takes the students beyond the classroom and out to the real world. First-year students whose concentration is youth advancement recently visited four different programs for at-risk youth: a “therapeutic” coffee shop and three youth advancement units. The tours were designed to enable the students to gain a better understanding and appreciation for Israel’s various youth advancement frameworks.
Located in Be’er Sheva, the Kapit Coffee Shop is run by the ELEM (Youth in Distress in Israel) organization and serves as a voluntary social and recreation center for teenagers. The staff is comprised of professionals and volunteers who deliver workshops and other activities and are available to speak to the kids “on their own terms.”
Set up by the Education Ministry, the youth advancement units are geared for at-risk teens who were unable to adjust or to find a place within the formal educational frameworks. These units allow the youth to complete their education through assorted educational social activities as well as employment training and counseling. Many Orot students work at these youth advancement units as part of their practical fieldwork.
As noted above, the first-year students visited three such units. At the Ramle unit – which caters to Jews, Christians, and Arabs - assimilation and its prevention are primary concerns. The students observed how the staff tries to respect the different populations while keeping them apart.
In Ashdod, the unit offers a wide range of individualized programming for teenagers from the city’s various population sectors – including native Israelis, new immigrants from the former Soviet Union and Ethiopia, and charedim. Orot students were introduced to the local youth employment initiative, which trains the kids and helps them develop important business skills.
Finally, in Beitar, the students learned how the unit’s programs and activities are tailored to meet the charedi community’s specific concerns and values. However, at the same time, the staff works hard to avoid stigmatizing the charedi at-risk youth.
The first-year Orot Israel College students enjoyed the four trips and agreed that they were very valuable.
“In general, the tours were outstanding, Baruch Hashem,” one student enthused. “We learned a lot, and we met amazing people.”
A second student concurred. “I was glad that we went to different units, in order to see the programs operating in real time, and not just in a theoretical manner in a classroom setting. The units are diverse and show us the unique features that each unit develops for itself, according to its own particular needs.”
A Tribute to Rabbi Dr. Yehuda Felix
The formal program commenced with greetings from Orot President, Rabbi Prof. Guttel, followed by warm words by the Chairman of Mercaz Yeshivot Bnei Akiva and recent winner of the distinguished Israel Prize, Rabbi Chaim Druckman. Rabbi Tzvi Neugershal, who was instrumental in helping Rav Felix establish the College and Mrs. Orly Weitzman, the principal of Ulpanat Tzvia in Kochav Yaakov and a member of the first Orot graduating class, both spoke about Orot's early days and the deep impact that Orot has made on religious education in the country. Guest lecturer, Prof. Y. Yeshurun from Bar Ilan University, formerly the Chairman of the Academic Council of Orot and an instrumental figure in helping Orot receive academic recognition, spoke on the topic of "Scientific Disputes and their Ramifications".
Rabbi Dr. Moshe Rachimi, Dean of Students at Orot, presented a leather-bound copy of the book published by Orot to Rabbi Felix. Mrs. Hadassa Feder, formerly the head of the Department of Special Education presented to Rabbi Felix a framed photograph of the campus.
Rabbi Felix in his words of summation thanked Orot for the generous gesture as well as the many people who came to this special tribute, who included Rabbi Yaakov Ariel, the Chief Rabbi of Ramat Gan, Rabbi Druckman, Rabbi Fogel, former MK's Nissan Smilansky and Shaul Yahalom, heads of Michlalaot, members of the Ministry of Education and Orot staff. Special mention was given to Devorah Felix by her husband and all the speakers, for without her ongoing support Rabbi Felix would have not been able to make the amazing contribution to Jewish education that he has made.
Without any doubt this was an evening to remember.
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Shades of Grey in the Purim Story
By Rabbi Reuven Spolter, Director of Recruiting and Jewish Studies Instructor
When we were young, we viewed the events surrounding us in black and white. Looking to categorize the confusion surrounding us, we searched for some level of simplicity in order to make some sense of the world. Our children are no different.
And yet, as we grow older we recognize that life is not always (actually almost never) black and white. We are often forced to decide between two competing values, both of which are good, or bad.
To my mind, Megillat Esther represents a perfect example of this phenomenon. At first glance, when we read the story of the Megillah, everything seems straightforward. There are heroes (Mordechai and Esther) and a villain (Haman). The "good" people do the right things, while the evil ones come dangerously close to genocide. Yet, when we take a deeper look at the Purim story with the assistance of the Midrash, we find that often the choices our heroes made were not at all clear at the time, and that they were forced to make difficult and agonizing decisions. I'd like to one example from the Megillah that I believe represents a good springboard for a broader discussion with our children about the choices that Mordechai and Esther face, and how not everything is as black and white as it seems.
When Mordechai learns of Haman's plot to destroy the Jewish people, he rushes to the palace instructing Esther to approach the king and beg him to save the Jewish people. Esther demurs, suggesting that she wait until Achashverosh calls her himself. After all, everyone knows that anyone who appears before the king uninvited is subject to immediate execution. Mordechai insists that she not delay at all, telling her,
And yet, was Esther's request so strange? Why indeed should she risk her life if the king was scheduled to call her soon? After all, Haman's plan was scheduled for almost a year later (it was Nissan, and the slaughter was scheduled for the following Adar). What's the rush? Moreover, the question grows even more complicated when we consider the relationship between Mordechai and Esther. Megillat Esther describes the relationship between Mordechai and Esther as אשר לקח לו לבת – "whom he took as a daughter". In essence, he adopted her. Yet, the Gemara (Megillah 13a) famously notes that, אל תקרי "לבת" אלא "לבית" – "Don't read it [that he took her as] 'a daughter'; rather [he took her as] 'a home'". According to the Gemara, Mordechai didn't just adopt Esther; he married her.
Until this point, every interaction that she had with the king was involuntary. Halachically, she was not responsible for the events that were beyond her control. If so, to approach the king on her own meant that she was voluntarily breaking the strictest laws of Judaism against immorality and adultery.
Considered from this angle, what indeed was the rush? Would it be so bad for her to wait a few more days? Even if we agreed that it was proper and appropriate to commit the worst types of sinful behavior to save the entire Jewish people, would that still be true if it was just a question of scheduling? After all, Esther would have eventually met with the king. Was it so important that she do so immediately?
Mordechai certainly thought so, and pressured her to act without delay, despite the halachic ramifications. I wonder whether a modern-day Esther, had she sent a quick hidden text message to a Gadol today, would have gotten the same message.
The issue isn't that foreign to us, even today. The State of Israel faces adversaries and enemies who harbor the same desires as Haman to end the existence of the Jewish people. While we don't often think about it, our country asks young men and women to hide their true identities and commit sinful acts to protect and defend the Jewish people. Would we agree with Mordechai's psak today if it meant preventing a terrorist attack?
And, on a far more personal level, what if the Mossad knocked on our door, claiming that our daughter was the perfect candidate for a dangerous covert operation. Would we, as Mordechai did, agree to allow our beloved children – or even our wives – to engage in such behavior?
Things really are not as black and white as they often seem.
When we were young, we viewed the events surrounding us in black and white. Looking to categorize the confusion surrounding us, we searched for some level of simplicity in order to make some sense of the world. Our children are no different.
And yet, as we grow older we recognize that life is not always (actually almost never) black and white. We are often forced to decide between two competing values, both of which are good, or bad.
To my mind, Megillat Esther represents a perfect example of this phenomenon. At first glance, when we read the story of the Megillah, everything seems straightforward. There are heroes (Mordechai and Esther) and a villain (Haman). The "good" people do the right things, while the evil ones come dangerously close to genocide. Yet, when we take a deeper look at the Purim story with the assistance of the Midrash, we find that often the choices our heroes made were not at all clear at the time, and that they were forced to make difficult and agonizing decisions. I'd like to one example from the Megillah that I believe represents a good springboard for a broader discussion with our children about the choices that Mordechai and Esther face, and how not everything is as black and white as it seems.
When Mordechai learns of Haman's plot to destroy the Jewish people, he rushes to the palace instructing Esther to approach the king and beg him to save the Jewish people. Esther demurs, suggesting that she wait until Achashverosh calls her himself. After all, everyone knows that anyone who appears before the king uninvited is subject to immediate execution. Mordechai insists that she not delay at all, telling her,
In other words, "Go now. Don't delay, even for a moment."אַל-תְּדַמִּי בְנַפְשֵׁךְ, לְהִמָּלֵט בֵּית-הַמֶּלֶךְ מִכָּל-הַיְּהוּדִים. כִּי אִם-הַחֲרֵשׁ תַּחֲרִישִׁי, בָּעֵת הַזֹּאת--רֶוַח וְהַצָּלָה יַעֲמוֹד לַיְּהוּדִים מִמָּקוֹם אַחֵר, וְאַתְּ וּבֵית-אָבִיךְ תֹּאבֵדוּ; וּמִי יוֹדֵעַ--אִם-לְעֵת כָּזֹאת, הִגַּעַתְּ לַמַּלְכוּת.Think not that you shall escape in the king's house, more than all the Jews. For if you remain silent at this time, then will relief and deliverance arise to the Jews from another place, but you and your father's house will perish; and who knows whether you did not come to royal estate for such a time as this?
And yet, was Esther's request so strange? Why indeed should she risk her life if the king was scheduled to call her soon? After all, Haman's plan was scheduled for almost a year later (it was Nissan, and the slaughter was scheduled for the following Adar). What's the rush? Moreover, the question grows even more complicated when we consider the relationship between Mordechai and Esther. Megillat Esther describes the relationship between Mordechai and Esther as אשר לקח לו לבת – "whom he took as a daughter". In essence, he adopted her. Yet, the Gemara (Megillah 13a) famously notes that, אל תקרי "לבת" אלא "לבית" – "Don't read it [that he took her as] 'a daughter'; rather [he took her as] 'a home'". According to the Gemara, Mordechai didn't just adopt Esther; he married her.
Until this point, every interaction that she had with the king was involuntary. Halachically, she was not responsible for the events that were beyond her control. If so, to approach the king on her own meant that she was voluntarily breaking the strictest laws of Judaism against immorality and adultery.
Considered from this angle, what indeed was the rush? Would it be so bad for her to wait a few more days? Even if we agreed that it was proper and appropriate to commit the worst types of sinful behavior to save the entire Jewish people, would that still be true if it was just a question of scheduling? After all, Esther would have eventually met with the king. Was it so important that she do so immediately?
Mordechai certainly thought so, and pressured her to act without delay, despite the halachic ramifications. I wonder whether a modern-day Esther, had she sent a quick hidden text message to a Gadol today, would have gotten the same message.
The issue isn't that foreign to us, even today. The State of Israel faces adversaries and enemies who harbor the same desires as Haman to end the existence of the Jewish people. While we don't often think about it, our country asks young men and women to hide their true identities and commit sinful acts to protect and defend the Jewish people. Would we agree with Mordechai's psak today if it meant preventing a terrorist attack?
And, on a far more personal level, what if the Mossad knocked on our door, claiming that our daughter was the perfect candidate for a dangerous covert operation. Would we, as Mordechai did, agree to allow our beloved children – or even our wives – to engage in such behavior?
Things really are not as black and white as they often seem.
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Orot Israel College Students Earn Award for Excellence
In a break with tradition, not one but two Orot Israel College students were recently awarded the annual and highly prestigious Rav David Ochs Prize for Excellence in Education. Generally, the supervisory committee selects no more than one student per college, but this year, two exceptional Orot students – Sharon Peretz and Vered Raskin - made the cut.
Peretz, a newlywed who is studying Tanach education and educational counseling, was very surprised to hear that she had won the award. Unbeknownst to her, Orot’s administration had nominated her, based on her academic achievements and extracurricular activities.
Raskin, 23, a Tanach and informal education student, notes the importance of social involvement. She says that she hopes to continue contributing to society and education in the future.
The judges were extremely impressed by the two young women’s accomplishments in the field of education. Thus, the committee decided to award the prize to both students – rather than choosing one over the other.
Interestingly, neither student is on Orot Israel College’s honors track. As Dr. Moshe Rachimi, Dean of Students, explains, “Students on the honor track earn many scholarships. This time, we wanted students who have demonstrated success in their academic studies to have a chance to earn a scholarship because of their achievements, and we are proud of their achievements.”
Orot Israel College boasts one of the country’s leading graduate programs in education. Among Israel’s religious colleges, Orot’s M.Ed. program is the largest, with hundreds of students.
The Rav David Ochs Prize is awarded annually and was established to promote education in Israel.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)